1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Chennai: Penalty Reduced to Rs. 5,000 under Finance Act Section 76. Commissioner (Appeals) can reduce penalties.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the reduction in penalty to Rs. 5,000 under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, citing precedents allowing ... Penalty-Reasonable cause- In the light of the various decisions held that department has not questioned the reason or cause shown by the assessee before the Commissioner (Appeals) for reduction in penalty, uphold the order of Commissioner (Appeals) and reject the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the reduction in penalty to Rs. 5,000 under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, following precedents where the Commissioner (Appeals) can reduce penalty if reasonable cause is shown by the assessee. The appeal by the revenue was rejected.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
