Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the declared high sea sale price of the imported goods was the correct transaction value for customs valuation, and whether enhancement of value by adopting the foreign supplier's price or a notional commission was justified.
Analysis: The imported goods were purchased under a high sea sale agreement and the appellant produced documentary evidence of the agreed consideration and payment. The value declared at the time of import was supported by the transaction documents, and there was no finding that any amount over and above the declared price had been paid. In this setting, the valuation had to be determined on the basis of the actual transaction between the high sea seller and the appellant. The circular issued by the Department also recognized that the actual high sea sale contract price paid by the last buyer would constitute transaction value, and that inclusion of commission on a notional basis would not be appropriate. The rejection of the declared value and enhancement on the basis of the supplier's price was therefore unsustainable.
Conclusion: The declared high sea sale price was held to be the correct transaction value, and the enhancement of assessable value was rejected in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the importer proves the actual high sea sale consideration and payment thereof, customs valuation must follow that transaction value and cannot be enhanced by adopting the foreign supplier's price or a notional commission.