Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for want of a reasonable opportunity and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The petitioner challenged the order on the ground that he had not been effectively heard before the tax proposal was confirmed. The record showed issuance of notice and hearing notices, but the order was passed without the petitioner responding or attending. The Court found it appropriate, in the interest of justice, to afford another opportunity while balancing the revenue's interest by requiring partial pre-deposit and a reply to the show cause notice within a stipulated time.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration, subject to the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand and filing a reply within the stipulated period.