TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Kerala HC Quashes Tax Case: Proceedings Dropped After Accused Pays Due Amount with Penal Interest Under IT Act.</h1> <h3>AUGUST CINEMA (INDIA) PVT. LTD., MR. SAJI NADESAN, MR. PRITHVIRAJ SUKUMARAN, MR. SANTHOSH SIVAN Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), UNION OF INDIA, STATE OF KERALA</h3> The HC of Kerala quashed the proceedings against the accused in CC No.637/2014, involving allegations under Section 276B of the Income Tax Act for ... Offence u/s 276B - accused was making various payments such as fees of artists and other contracts, professional and other consultancy charges, rents etc., without deducting tax at source (TDS) - HELD THAT:- As per section 276B if a person fails to pay to the credit of the Central Government, the tax deducted at source by him as required by or under the provision of Chapter XVII(B) or the tax payable by him as required or under sub Section (2) of Section 115-O or the second proviso to Section 194B, shall be punishable with imprisonment not less than three months but which may extend to 7 years and with fine. In this case, the allegation is that, the petitioners never deducted tax at source. If that be the case, there is force in the argument of the petitioners that Section 276B is not attracted. Moreover, the entire amount with penal interest is already paid by the petitioners. If that be the case, the continuation of prosecution is not necessary against the petitioners. Therefore, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed. All further proceedings against the petitioners on the file of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court (Economic Offences) Ernakulam are quashed. Issues:1. Allegation of non-deduction of tax at source by the accused.2. Interpretation of Section 276B of the Income Tax Act.3. Necessity of prosecution under Section 276B.Detailed Analysis:The judgment by the High Court of Kerala involved the case of accused Nos. 1 to 4 in CC No.637/2014, where they were accused of not deducting tax at source as required by the Income Tax Act. The complaint was filed by the Income Tax Officer (TDS), alleging an offence under Section 276B of the Income Tax Act. The petitioners argued that even if the allegations were accepted, no offence was made out. The petitioners contended that during the financial year 2010-11, TDS was not deducted due to ignorance, but the entire amount along with penal interest was paid upon realization of the mistake (para. 2-4).The court examined Section 276B of the Income Tax Act, which stipulates punishment for failure to pay tax deducted at source or tax payable to the Central Government. The section provides for imprisonment ranging from three months to seven years along with a fine for non-compliance. The court noted that the petitioners had paid the entire outstanding amount with penal interest upon being informed by the department (para. 4-5).The court considered the argument put forth by the petitioners that Section 276B is intended for non-payment of already deducted TDS and since the amount was paid in full, the prosecution under this section was not warranted. The court agreed with this argument, stating that if the petitioners had rectified the mistake by paying the outstanding amount along with interest, the continuation of the prosecution was unnecessary. Consequently, the court allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Case and quashed all further proceedings against the petitioners in CC No.637/2014 (para. 6).
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
