Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Assessment order quashed for denying video conferencing after approval and technical failures violated natural justice Gujarat HC quashed an assessment order under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B for violating natural justice principles. The court held that while ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Assessment order quashed for denying video conferencing after approval and technical failures violated natural justice
Gujarat HC quashed an assessment order under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B for violating natural justice principles. The court held that while video conferencing wasn't mandatory for AY 2018-19, the department was obligated to provide it after approving and failing twice due to technical difficulties. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh proceedings with proper video conference hearing opportunity.
Issues: Challenge to Assessment Order for Assessment Year 2018-19 on the ground of lack of opportunity of hearing through video conference.
Analysis: The petitioner challenged the Assessment Order dated 20.09.2021 for the Assessment Year 2018-19 under Section 143 (3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, citing lack of opportunity for a video conference hearing as a breach of natural justice. The petitioner's income declaration was scrutinized, and a show-cause notice proposing a substantial addition under Section 68 of the Act was issued. Despite the petitioner's detailed replies and requests for a video conference hearing, technical difficulties and miscommunications led to failed attempts at conducting the hearing.
The petitioner contended that despite their efforts to explain the situation and request a new video conference hearing, the Assessment Order was passed without further communication, reiterating the proposed addition. The petitioner argued that the principles of natural justice required the order to be quashed and the matter to be remanded for a fresh hearing through video conferencing to ensure a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present their case.
The respondent, represented by Senior Standing Counsel, argued that the petitioner had been provided with sufficient opportunities for a video conference hearing, as evidenced by the intimation containing the password for the scheduled conference. The respondent claimed that the petitioner's failure to join the conference on the specified date was not due to a lack of password, contradicting the petitioner's assertions.
The Court observed that the respondent Department failed to respond to the petitioner's submissions after the failed video conference attempt, indicating a lack of communication and effort to rectify the situation. Despite no mandatory requirement for video conferencing for the relevant assessment year, the Court held that since the option was approved for the petitioner and previous attempts were unsuccessful due to technical issues on the respondent's end, providing a fair opportunity for a video conference hearing was necessary to uphold the principles of natural justice.
Therefore, the Court quashed the Assessment Order dated 20.09.2021 and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to conduct a fresh hearing through video conferencing within 12 weeks, emphasizing the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice in the assessment process.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
of 
TaxTMI 
