Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a departmental letter advising voluntary payment of alleged GST liability without issuance of any show cause notice, demand notice or recovery notice could be sustained.
Analysis: The letter was found to be a direction for continued voluntary payment towards an asserted tax liability, coupled with reference to interest under section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, but without any statutory notice or other lawful foundation pointed out by the Department. The Court treated the communication as an impermissible pressure mechanism rather than a lawful adjudicatory or recovery step.
Conclusion: The impugned letter was quashed and set aside, and the writ petition was allowed in favour of the petitioner.