Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tax Assessment Order Quashed Due to Procedural Flaws in ITC Claim, Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Respond Within Two Weeks</h1> <h3>Maasha Garments, TIrupur, Tamil Nadu Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Goods and Services Tax Network, New Delhi</h3> HC set aside tax assessment order involving improper Input Tax Credit (ITC) claim on motor vehicles. Court found procedural irregularities in notice ... Challenge to assesment order along with the summary of the order in Form DRC-07 - wrongful claiming of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the purchase of four motor cars from M/s Ramani Cars Private Limited, which was ineligible under Section 17(5) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 - petitioner was unaware of these notices due to the introduction of a new 'View Additional Notices and Orders' feature on the GST portal, which was not adequately communicated - violation of principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- The facts remain that the petitioner had purchased four motor cars for the usage of passenger service. In the course of filing their returns, they mistakenly claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on these purchases, which was not permissible under the relevant provision of law, as the vehicles were intended for personal use rather than for business purposes. On realising the same, they voluntarily reversed the wrongly availed ITC in their March 2023 return, before the closing of the financial year. However, the first respondent passed the assessment order, after issuing pre-show cause notice and show cause notice. According to the petitioner, they did not aware of the said notices served through 'view additional notices and orders' portal and hence, they were unable to file their reply to the same and hence, an opportunity be provided to them to substantiate their claim. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court in order to provide an opportunity to the petitioner, is inclined to set aside the order passed by the first respondent. Accordingly, the order dated 20.02.2024 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the first respondent for fresh consideration - Petition disposed off by way of remand. Issues:Challenge to assessment order under CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 for financial year 2022-23; Claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on ineligible purchases; Allegations of wrongful ITC claim; Lack of awareness of notices due to GST portal feature; Request for quashing assessment order.Analysis:The petitioner, a registered dealer under CGST and TNGST Acts, mistakenly claimed ITC on the purchase of four motor cars, which was ineligible under Section 17(5) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017. Upon realizing the error, the petitioner promptly reversed the ITC amount. Despite this, the first respondent issued scrutiny, pre-show cause, and show cause notices, leading to the impugned assessment order demanding the reversed ITC, penalties, and interest. The petitioner claimed unawareness of the notices due to a new feature on the GST portal and sought to quash the assessment order based on the expired statutory appeal period.The court noted that the petitioner erroneously claimed ITC on personal use vehicles, which was not permissible under the law. The petitioner voluntarily rectified the mistake by reversing the ITC in the subsequent return. However, the assessment order was passed without considering the petitioner's response to the notices issued. The court acknowledged the petitioner's lack of awareness of the notices and decided to set aside the order, remanding the matter to the first respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was directed to file a reply to the show cause notice within two weeks, and the respondent was instructed to consider the reply, conduct a personal hearing, and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.In conclusion, the court disposed of the writ petition without costs, setting aside the assessment order and providing the petitioner with an opportunity to present their case before the first respondent. The judgment emphasized the need for procedural fairness and the right to be heard in matters of tax assessments under the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found