Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether equipment rental receipts from leasing machinery and equipment used in mineral oil exploration were taxable under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12 of the India-Malaysia DTAA.
Analysis: The receipts arose from giving on hire equipment used or to be used in prospecting, extraction, or production of mineral oils, bringing the activity within the special scheme of section 44BB. The exclusion in Explanation 2(iva) to section 9(1)(vi) removes from the definition of royalty the amounts referred to in section 44BB. The absence of a permanent establishment condition in section 44BB and the special character of that provision meant that the receipts could not be taxed as royalty merely because they involved use of equipment. The earlier decision in the assessee's own case on identical facts was followed.
Conclusion: The receipts were taxable under section 44BB and not as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) or Article 12 of the India-Malaysia DTAA. The appeals were allowed.