Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order under Section 73 of the CGST/DGST regime was liable to be stayed at the interim stage on the ground that it was unreasoned and ignored the petitioner's reply, and whether the challenge to the special audit and the related notification raised issues warranting further consideration.
Analysis: The petition assailed the assessment order and the preceding show cause notice, alleging lack of jurisdiction in initiating the special audit under Section 66 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, limitation, and challenge to the notification issued under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. At the interim stage, the Court recorded a prima facie view that the impugned order did not deal with the contentious issues or the petitioner's reply and merely stated that the reply was unsatisfactory.
Outcome: The impugned order was stayed till the next date of hearing, and notice was issued with directions for pleadings.