Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appeals Allowed: Co-noticees' Penalties u/r 26 Dismissed After Main Appellant Settled Case Under SVLDRS 2019.</h1> <h3>M/s. Vinayak shipping Services, M/s. Sainath Clearing Agency, M/s. Shivam Clearing Agency, M/s. S.K. Mehra Clearing and Forwarding Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Nikhil Shipping Agency, M/s. SP Impex, M/s. Aman Impex, M/s. Ambika Overseas, M/s. Swill Metal Industries, M/s. Manoj Cargo Carriers, M/s. A Abba & Sons and Mr. Nagendra Shambhunath Tripathi, Prop. Of M/s. Vardhaman Shipping & Transport Co. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore</h3> The appeals contested personal penalties under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The primary appellant resolved the matter under SVLDRS, 2019. ... Levy of personal penalty on each of the appellant u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - HELD THAT:- This Tribunal in the cases of SHRI S. BHARATH REDDY, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. BRITISH NUTRITIONS PRIVATE LIMITED & SHRI V.S. REDDY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, M/S. BRITISH NUTRITIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BANGALORE [2024 (6) TMI 1394 - CESTAT BANGALORE], SHRI RAGHAVENDRA, PLANT MANAGER M/S. L.G. BALAKRISHNA & BROS. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MYSORE [2024 (5) TMI 1335 - CESTAT BANGALORE] and M/S JPFL FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED, JALAN JEE POLYTEX LTD., KAVITA INTERNATIONAL AGENCY, KULDEEP SINGH, DP SINGH, R KNITFAB, PERFECT DESIGNER, VK KALRA, RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, KANPUR WOOL INDUSTRIES, SWASTIK TRADING CO., APEX CORPORATION AND MANSA TRADERS VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, LUDHIANA [2023 (12) TMI 304 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH] held that once the main appeal is settled under SVLDRS, 2019, the appeals filed by the co-noticees challenging the personal penalty arising out of the same Order-in-Original cannot be sustained. The appeals filed by the appellants deserve to be allowed and the same are allowed. The appeals challenged personal penalties under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The main appellant settled under SVLDRS, 2019. Tribunal held that co-noticees' appeals against penalties cannot be sustained once main appeal is settled. Appeals allowed.