Refunds must be adjusted first against interest payable then principal tax under section 244A

ITAT Mumbai held that when computing interest under section 244A, refunds must be adjusted first against interest payable and then against principal tax amount. The Revenue's contention that this constitutes compound interest was rejected. The tribunal found the AO incorrectly adjusted refunds by reducing interest only to the extent determined at earlier refund issuance, leading to larger adjustment towards tax component. Following coordinate bench precedents and applying the same principle used in tax collection to refund grants, the tribunal directed the AO to recompute interest under section 244A per the assessee's detailed working. Appeal allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Revision of interest under Section 244A.
2. Adjustment of refund against interest and tax payable.
3. Calculation of interest under Section 244A and the allegation of compound interest.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Revision of Interest under Section 244A:
The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in accepting the assessee's plea for revising the interest under Section 244A, ignoring that the AO had issued a notice under Section 154 and the assessee had given its NOC before the rectification order was passed. The Tribunal observed that the notice issued under Section 154 only mentioned the rectification of the total income due to an arithmetical mistake and did not mention any rectification of interest under Section 244A. The Tribunal noted that any amendment that enhances an assessment or reduces a refund requires a notice and an opportunity for the assessee to be heard, which was not provided in this case. Therefore, the rectification of interest under Section 244A was deemed improper.

2. Adjustment of Refund Against Interest and Tax Payable:
The core issue was whether the refund should first be adjusted against the interest payable to the assessee and the balance, if any, towards the tax payable. The assessee argued that the AO's method of adjusting refunds first towards outstanding taxes and then towards interest was incorrect. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, citing judicial precedents that support the adjustment of refunds first towards interest and then towards the tax component. The Tribunal found that this method does not result in compound interest, as alleged by the Revenue.

3. Calculation of Interest under Section 244A and Allegation of Compound Interest:
The Revenue argued that the CIT(A)'s direction to adjust refunds first towards interest payable would result in compound interest, which is not allowed by law. The Tribunal referred to several judicial precedents, including decisions from the Mumbai ITAT and the Delhi High Court, which consistently held that refunds should first be adjusted against interest due under Section 244A and the balance against tax. The Tribunal also distinguished the Supreme Court's decision in Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals, noting that the assessee was not claiming interest on interest but rather the correct adjustment of refunds. The Tribunal directed the AO to compute the interest under Section 244A as claimed by the assessee, following the principle laid down in the judicial precedents.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. It directed the AO to compute the interest under Section 244A as per the assessee's detailed working, ensuring that the assessee is given a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The order was pronounced in the open court on 30 August 2024.

---