GST Registration Cancellation Suspended: Procedural Flaws Prompt Reassessment of Show Cause Notices and Hearing Rights

SC partially allowed petition challenging GST registration cancellation. Court found procedural irregularities in show cause notices and cancellation orders. Directed Assessing Officer to re-examine matter, provide detailed reasons, and offer proper hearing to petitioner. Registration remained suspended pending fresh proceedings. No merit-based determination made, focusing solely on procedural compliance.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to order of cancellation of registration on grounds of lack of hearing and reasons provided; Non-compliance with court guidelines on show cause notices; Dismissal of appeals under Section 107 of GST Act; Remand of matter to Assessing Officer with specific directions.

Analysis:

The petitioner challenged the order of cancellation of registration on the basis of not being provided with an opportunity of hearing and the absence of reasons for the cancellation. The Appellate Authority upheld the cancellation order on the ground of limitation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 107 of the GST Act. The petitioner contended that the respondent authorities were issuing cryptic notices and orders for cancellation of registration despite court guidelines issued in a previous judgment. The court emphasized the importance of following procedural aspects diligently to avoid unnecessary litigation, as highlighted in the earlier case of M/s. Aggrawal Dyeing & Printing vs. State of Gujarat. The court directed the respondent authorities to issue detailed show cause notices with reasons incorporated and provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioners before passing appropriate orders on merits.

The court noted that the order of cancellation of registration in the present matter was passed without providing any reasons by the respondent authorities, and the appeals filed by the petitioners under Section 107 of the GST Act were also dismissed. As a result, the revisional power under Section 108 of the GST Act could not be exercised by the respondent authorities. Therefore, the court quashed and set aside the impugned orders, remanding the matter back to the Assessing Officer at the show cause notice stage. The registration of the petitioner was to remain suspended until the show cause notice was decided by the Assessing Officer, with specific directions provided for the process to be followed.

The court partly allowed the petition by setting aside the impugned orders and remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for further proceedings in accordance with the provided directions. It was clarified that the court did not delve into the merits of the case, emphasizing that the respondent authorities must pass appropriate orders in compliance with the law after providing detailed reasons and an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petition was disposed of, with notice discharged and no order as to costs issued.

---