Business bank deposits taxed only on the income element where receipts are linked to verified turnover and the estimate is not arbitrary.

Bank deposits shown to arise from business operations could not be taxed as the entire unexplained amount under section 69A; only the income element from the receipts and any limited unexplained balance could be brought to tax. After repeated remands and verification of bank accounts, supplier ledgers and turnover, the appellate authority excluded inter-bank contra entries, separated business receipts from unexplained deposits, and estimated profit on the disclosed turnover. The Tribunal upheld that exercise, finding no denial of opportunity and no arbitrariness in the estimate, and sustained the partial relief granted to the assessee while rejecting the Revenue's attempt to tax the full deposits.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the cash deposited in bank accounts could be treated wholly as unexplained money under section 69A, or whether the business receipts had to be separated from the deposits and income estimated only on the profit element.

Analysis: The assessee had not filed returns and the assessment was framed ex parte, but the appellate proceedings involved repeated remands, examination of additional material, and verification of bank accounts, supplier ledgers and business turnover. The appellate authority found that the deposits were linked to business activity, that inter-bank contra entries had to be excluded, and that only the income portion of the receipts could be brought to tax. It estimated profit on the disclosed turnover and treated only the unexplained balance as taxable. The Tribunal found no denial of opportunity, accepted the detailed appellate exercise, and held that the estimate was not arbitrary.

Conclusion: The addition of the entire bank deposits was not sustained; only the estimated business income and the limited unexplained balance remained taxable, which was upheld against the assessee's challenge and against the Revenue's attempt to tax the full deposits.

Final Conclusion: The appellate authority's partial relief to the assessee was confirmed, the Revenue's challenge to full taxation of deposits failed, and the consolidated appeals and cross-objections were dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where bank deposits are shown to arise from business operations, tax can be levied only on the income element and not on the gross receipts, and once a reasoned estimation of income is made on verified material, it will not be disturbed unless shown to be arbitrary.

---