DTAA make available test limits taxability of routine IT support and cost-to-cost reimbursements

Routine IT support services under a DTAA were analysed against the fees for technical services and fees for included services tests, and were found not taxable where they did not transfer technology, technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes to the recipient. Assistance or training alone was insufficient because the recipient was not enabled to apply the technology independently. The document further states that the make available condition was not satisfied and that cost-to-cost allocations without markup or profit element retained the character of reimbursement rather than income chargeable to tax.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether receipts from IT support services were taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services under the applicable DTAA; (ii) whether the make available condition was satisfied and the receipts were nevertheless taxable despite being on a cost-to-cost reimbursement basis without profit element.

Issue (i): Whether receipts from IT support services were taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services under the applicable DTAA.

Analysis: The services were routine, recurring IT support functions provided under a continuing arrangement. The services did not involve a transfer of technology, technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes to the recipient. The fact that assistance or training was provided did not, by itself, convert the services into technical services where the underlying knowledge was not imparted in a manner enabling the recipient to apply it independently.

Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services merely by reason of the nature of IT support rendered.

Issue (ii): Whether the make available condition was satisfied and the receipts were nevertheless taxable despite being on a cost-to-cost reimbursement basis without profit element.

Analysis: The recipient was not enabled to apply the technology on its own after the service arrangement. The record also supported the claim that the amounts were allocated on a reimbursement basis without markup or profit element, and no effective rebuttal was brought by the tax authorities. On these facts, the character of the receipts remained reimbursement of costs rather than income chargeable to tax.

Conclusion: The make available condition was not satisfied and the cost-to-cost reimbursements were not taxable income.

Final Conclusion: The additions made in both appeals could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded on the core taxability issue.

Ratio Decidendi: For services to fall within the make available clause, the recipient must be enabled to apply the technology independently after the contract, and a mere rendering of routine support or training without transfer of enduring technical capability does not satisfy that test; cost-to-cost reimbursements without profit element do not, by themselves, constitute taxable income.

---