Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>TDS credit allowed only in financial year when corresponding income is assessed to tax</h1> The ITAT Delhi held that TDS credit can only be granted in the financial year when the corresponding income is assessed to tax. Following precedent from ... Credit of TDS - HELD THAT:- In assessee own case in AY 2007-08 and 2009-10 Tribunal held that the credit of TDS in a financial year can be granted only when income corresponding to such TDS is assessed to tax in the said financial year. Further, the Tribunal directed that the assessee will be at liberty to approach the Assessing Officer for claiming credit of TDS in the concerned year and the AO may allow the claim in accordance with law. We hereby hold that credit of TDS in a financial year may be granted only when income corresponding to such TDS is assessed to tax in the said financial year. Further, the assessee will be at liberty to approach the Assessing Officer for claiming the such credit in the concerned year in which income is offered and the AO may allow the same in accordance with law. Ground no.1 to 4 of the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Consideration of current year business loss - AO is directed to verify the claim of the assessee and to consider the current year business loss while computing the assessed income as per law. Issues Involved:1. Addition of Rs. 10,75,12,135/- as undisclosed income.2. Correctness of accounting standards followed by the appellant.3. Reconciliation of income reported in Form 26AS and income offered to tax.4. Direction to avoid double taxation of Rs. 10,75,12,135/- in different assessment years.5. Non-adjudication of grounds of appeal number 3.1 to 3.6 by CIT(A).6. Consideration of current year business loss of Rs. 2,23,09,961/-.7. Adjustment of Rs. 1,92,09,526 as refund and interest under section 244A.8. Granting credit of TDS amounting to Rs. 21,64,741/-.9. Deletion of interest levied under section 234B of Rs. 12,92,811/-.10. Deletion of interest levied under section 234D of Rs. 1,58,393/-.11. Dropping initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c).Detailed Analysis:1. Addition of Rs. 10,75,12,135/- as Undisclosed Income:The primary issue in this appeal is the addition of Rs. 10,75,12,135/- to the total income of the assessee, which was not deleted by the CIT(A). The AO observed a discrepancy between the sales declared in the profit & loss account and the sales as per TDS Certificates, leading to an addition of Rs. 10.75 Crores as undisclosed income. The assessee argued that the discrepancy was due to client errors and timing differences in revenue recognition.2. Correctness of Accounting Standards Followed by the Appellant:The CIT(A) noted that the appellant was not following the correct accounting standard, specifically AS-9 on 'Revenue Recognition.' The appellant's practice of claiming TDS credit in one year while declaring the corresponding income in another year was not acceptable. The CIT(A) directed the AO to verify the claim and allow TDS as per sub-rule 3 and Rule 37BA of the I.T. Rules.3. Reconciliation of Income Reported in Form 26AS and Income Offered to Tax:The CIT(A) observed that the appellant needed to reconcile the receipts as per TDS certificates with the income declared in the profit & loss account. The appellant's argument that the discrepancy was due to timing differences and client errors was not accepted. The CIT(A) stated that the credit for TDS should be claimed in the year the corresponding income is declared.4. Direction to Avoid Double Taxation of Rs. 10,75,12,135/- in Different Assessment Years:The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that TDS credit should be granted only when the corresponding income is assessed to tax in the same financial year. The Tribunal directed that the assessee could approach the AO for claiming TDS credit in the relevant year, and the AO should allow the claim in accordance with the law.5. Non-Adjudication of Grounds of Appeal Number 3.1 to 3.6 by CIT(A):The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) did not adjudicate grounds of appeal number 3.1 to 3.6. These grounds were raised in the current appeal as ground nos. 5.1 to 5.4.6. Consideration of Current Year Business Loss of Rs. 2,23,09,961/-:The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the claim of the assessee and consider the current year business loss of Rs. 2,23,09,961/- while computing the assessed income as per law.7. Adjustment of Rs. 1,92,09,526 as Refund and Interest under Section 244A:The AO was directed to verify the claim of the assessee and to allow interest under section 244A as per law.8. Granting Credit of TDS Amounting to Rs. 21,64,741/-:The AO was directed to verify the claim of the assessee and to allow the claim of TDS amounting to Rs. 21,64,741/- as per law.9. Deletion of Interest Levied under Section 234B of Rs. 12,92,811/-:The AO was directed to verify the claim of the assessee and to levy interest under section 234B as per law.10. Deletion of Interest Levied under Section 234D of Rs. 1,58,393/-:The AO was directed to verify the claim of the assessee and to levy interest under section 234D as per law.11. Dropping Initiation of Penalty Proceedings under Section 271(1)(c):The Tribunal found this ground premature as the assessee would receive an independent notice for the initiation of penalty proceedings and has a remedy of appeal against any penalty imposed. Hence, this ground was rejected.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for the AO to verify and consider various claims of the assessee as per law. The Tribunal emphasized the need for consistency in claiming TDS credit and declaring corresponding income in the same financial year.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found