GST section 130 proceedings cannot be initiated for excess stock found during survey, sections 73/74 apply instead

The Allahabad HC ruled that proceedings under section 130 of the GST Act cannot be initiated when excess stock is found during a survey. The court held that such circumstances require proceedings under sections 73/74 of the GST Act instead. Following established precedent, the HC found that the revenue authorities incorrectly applied section 130 read with rule 120 for excess stock discovered during a survey conducted at the petitioner's business premises. The impugned orders passed by the adjudicating authority and first appellate authority were set aside, and the petition was allowed.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to impugned orders under UPGST Act, validity of proceedings under sections 73/74 of the GST Act, applicability of section 130 of the GST Act, determination of tax and penalty, proper assessment procedures.

Detailed Analysis:
The High Court heard a writ petition challenging orders dated 11.05.2022 and 10.04.2023 under the UPGST Act. The petitioner, a partnership firm in the iron and steel business, contested the initiation of proceedings under section 130 of the GST Act, arguing that proceedings under sections 73/74 of the GST Act should have been initiated instead. The petitioner highlighted the lack of physical verification and video recording during the stock inspection, relying on a previous judgment (S/s Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar Vs. Additional Commissioner). The State and Union of India supported the impugned orders (para 3-6).

The Court noted the excess stock found during the survey at the petitioner's premises, leading to the proceedings. Referring to previous judgments, the Court emphasized that proceedings under sections 73/74 of the GST Act should be invoked in cases of excess stock, not section 130 of the GST Act. Citing a recent judgment (S/s Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar), the Court reiterated the necessity of proper assessment procedures under the Act, specifically mentioning the provisions of Section 74 for determining tax liabilities (para 8-9).

The Court extensively quoted from previous judgments to establish the correct legal principles. It highlighted that the entire tax assessment and penalty determination process should align with the provisions of Section 73 or Section 74 of the Act. The Court emphasized that proceedings under section 130 of the GST Act cannot be valid if excess stock is found during a survey, as the liability to pay tax arises at the time of supply. The Court quashed the impugned orders dated 11.05.2022 and 10.04.2023, ruling in favor of the petitioner and allowing the writ petition (para 9-13).

In conclusion, the judgment clarified the legal position that proceedings under section 130 of the GST Act cannot be initiated solely based on excess stock found during a survey. Proper assessment procedures under sections 73/74 of the GST Act must be followed, and tax liabilities should be determined in accordance with the statutory provisions. The Court upheld the petitioner's arguments and quashed the impugned orders, allowing the writ petition.

---