Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the employees' contribution to the National Pension Scheme paid before the due date for filing the return could be disallowed in processing under section 143(1); and whether such payment was governed by the disallowance rule applicable to employees' contribution under section 36(1)(va) or was otherwise allowable.
Analysis: The assessee's payment was towards the National Pension System, which is regulated by the PFRDA Act, 2013. The order notes that no due date is prescribed under the PFRDA framework for remittance to the NPS account, and that the contribution had in fact been made before the due date for filing the return under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal also treated the amount as allowable under section 43B(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and held that the CPC could not ignore the assessee's explanation while making an adjustment in section 143(1) proceedings. The order further records that section 12(3)(iii) of the PFRDA Act, 2013 supports the distinct character of NPS payments.
Conclusion: The disallowance of the NPS contribution was not sustainable, and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Final Conclusion: The adjustment made in processing the return was deleted and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an NPS contribution is paid before the return-filing deadline and the governing pension law prescribes no separate due date, the amount cannot be disallowed as delayed employees' contribution in section 143(1) processing and is allowable under section 43B(b).