Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned show cause notice and demand order under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were liable to be quashed for breach of natural justice on the ground of alleged absence of effective opportunity of reply and personal hearing.
Analysis: The petition challenged the notice under section 73 and the consequential demand on the footing that no proper opportunity of hearing had been granted. The record, however, showed that the section 61 notice required only a reply and that the section 73 notice carried the date, time and place for personal hearing. The petitioner had not filed a reply to the show cause notice, and the asserted adjournment requests were not shown to have been received. In these circumstances, the plea based on natural justice was found unacceptable in the facts of the case, and the authority relied upon by the petitioner was held to be inapplicable.
Conclusion: The challenge to the show cause notice and demand order was rejected, and the writ petition was dismissed. The petitioner was left at liberty to pursue the statutory appeal under section 107.