Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Assessment Order Quashed for Lack of Reasons; New Proceedings Allowed with Compliance Assurance for AY 2017-2018.</h1> The HC quashed the assessment order issued on a best judgment basis due to the failure to provide reasons for reopening the assessment for AY 2017-2018. ... Validity of reopening of assessment - Non providing the reasons to assessee though requested - respondents, submits that the petitioner did not request for reasons through the ITBA portal, therefore, the request for reasons did not come to the notice of the AO - HELD THAT:- As prior to the amended regime being put it place with regard to re-assessment proceedings, by virtue of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts [2002 (11) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT] the Income-tax Department was under an obligation to provide reasons if requested for by the assessee concerned after filing the return of income pursuant to receiving notice under Section 148. In the case at hand, admittedly, the petitioner filed the return of income and, thereafter, requested for reasons for reopening the assessment by e-mail of 21.04.2021. On examining the impugned assessment order, it is evident that the e-mail address from which the petitioner requested for reasons for reopening the assessment is the same as the registered e-mail ID of the assessee. In these circumstances, the failure to provide reasons for reopening the assessment is fatal. Therefore, WP is allowed and the impugned assessment order is quashed by leaving it open to the respondents to initiate de novo proceedings in accordance with law. The petitioner challenged an assessment order issued on best judgment basis. The petitioner had filed her original income return for Assessment Year 2017-2018. Despite requesting reasons for reopening the assessment, they were not provided. The High Court quashed the assessment order and allowed the respondents to initiate new proceedings.