Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Calcutta HC allows delayed filing of GST ITC-01 form for small businessman affected by Covid-19 circumstances</h1> Calcutta HC directed respondent authorities to allow petitioner to upload input tax credit certificate on web portal by condoning delays. Petitioner, a ... Direction upon the respondents to allow the petitioner to upload the input tax credit certificate in the web portal of the respondent authorities by condoning the delays in the petitioner’s attempt to upload such certificate - HELD THAT:- The petitioner who is small businessman was dependent on his chartered accountant for filing his return. It was the Covid-19 period. The petitioner had duly made an application for withdrawal from composition scheme. Such application of the petitioner was submitted on 12th November, 2021 and the same was approved by the authorities. Although, the petitioner was required to make a declaration electronically on the common portal in Form GST ITC-01 within 30 days from the date of approval, it appears that there was a delay of 2 days. The fact that the petitioner was prevented from submitting his return within the time specified is not called in question by the authorities/ by the Joint Commissioner. In fact, the Joint Commissioner has accepted the explanation given by the petitioner. Although, a defence is being sought to be set up by the respondents that there is no provision for condonation of delay, the respondents cannot be permitted to raise such defence having not challenged the order dated 9th March, 2022. In any event, the aforesaid defence set up by the respondents is misconceived as would appear from Rule 40 (1) (b) of the said Rules. Since, from the order dated 1st April, 2022 it would be apparent that the Joint Commissioner State Tax had accepted the explanation given by the petitioner and had found that the delay was condonable in the fact of the case, however, having not been identified any provision in the Act or Rules, he did not allow the application, in the peculiar circumstances, this is a fit case for directing to the respondent authorities to condone delay and permit the petitioner to file Form GST ITC-01. The writ petition stands disposed of. Issues:1. Delay in uploading input tax credit certificate on the web portal.2. Condonation of delay in filing Form GST ITC-01.3. Interpretation of Rule 40(1)(b) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.Analysis:1. The petitioner sought direction to upload the input tax credit certificate on the web portal, citing delays due to pandemic and medical reasons. The petitioner's application for withdrawal from the composition scheme was approved, requiring the certificate upload within 30 days. Despite a 2-day delay, the authorities rejected the condonation request, prompting a writ petition (WPA 3479 of 2022) and subsequent court orders for reconsideration.2. The Joint Commissioner rejected the condonation citing lack of legal provision, despite finding the petitioner's explanation satisfactory. The petitioner argued for condonation based on a similar case precedent from the Allahabad High Court. The State GST and CGST authorities opposed, relying on the Privy Council judgment in Maqbul Ahmad v. Onkar Pratap Narain Singh (AIR 1935 PC 85), emphasizing timely filing requirements.3. The High Court noted the petitioner's reliance on Rule 40(1)(b), allowing the Commissioner to extend time limits. The court found the Commissioner's failure to consider this provision and the previous court order directing reconsideration as crucial. It distinguished the Privy Council judgment, asserting the statute's provision for time extension, making the delay condonable. The court directed the authorities to permit the petitioner to file Form GST ITC-01, emphasizing the statutory power to condone delays and the need to adhere to court directions.This detailed analysis covers the issues of delay in uploading the tax credit certificate, the condonation of delay, and the interpretation of relevant tax rules, providing a comprehensive understanding of the judgment's key aspects and legal reasoning.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found