Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Extends Stay on Rs. 7.34 Crore Demand for 180 Days, Urges Timely DRP Action Amid Legal Developments.</h1> The Tribunal granted the assessee's application for an extension of the stay of demand amounting to Rs. 7,34,33,297/- for 180 days or until the appeal's ... Application for extension of stay of demand - proceedings going on with grant of extension of stay has exceeded 365 days - non-disposal of rectification application by DRP - HELD THAT:- As examined the assessee has all throughout acted in a bonafide manner and has cooperated with the department but has not got any relief by way of disposal of its rectification application which is pending before the department. The assessee has also taken reasonable efforts to pursue the matter for a speedy disposal from the department as had been evidenced on record. Considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, specifically the delay caused by the department in not disposing the rectification application filed by the assessee dated 31.12.2020, we are of the considered view that DRP shall pass order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order and the ld. DR is directed to make all efforts and communications with the DRP so that the said pending proceedings are completed within the said time frame. The assessee is also directed to ensure requisite compliance with any notices of the DRP, if any, and make reasonable efforts so that the proceedings before the DRP are completed within the time limit specified in this order. There is also an appeal pending before the ITAT filed by the assessee. Therefore, this stay is granted for a period of 180 days or till the disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier. The stay is granted as per the above terms and conditions Issues:Extension of stay of demand exceeding 365 days, non-disposal of rectification application by DRP, inherent power of Tribunal to grant interim relief, legal provisions regarding vacation of stay of demand, bonafide conduct of the assessee, direction for timely disposal of rectification application.Analysis:The judgment pertains to an application for the extension of stay of demand amounting to Rs. 7,34,33,297/- filed by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the stay had been previously extended multiple times due to the bonafide conduct of the assessee and the delay in final disposal of the matter not being attributable to any deliberate or malafide conduct on the part of the assessee. It was highlighted that the assessee had filed a rectification application before the DRP, which remained pending, and the delay in disposal of the application was not due to any malafide conduct of the assessee.The Tribunal acknowledged the power vested in it to grant interim relief, citing legal precedents such as the case of ITO Vs. N.K. Mohammed Kunhi. It was emphasized that the Tribunal could continue the interim relief even if the delay in disposal of the appeal exceeded 365 days, as per the recent legal developments striking down the provision for automatic vacation of stay of demand in such cases. The judgment clarified that if the delay was not attributable to the assessee and the assessee acted bonafide, the stay of demand could be extended beyond 365 days.In the present case, the Tribunal found that the assessee had acted in a bonafide manner, cooperated with the department, and made reasonable efforts to pursue the disposal of the rectification application pending before the DRP. In light of the delay caused by the department in disposing of the rectification application, the Tribunal directed the DRP to pass an order within two months and instructed the assessee to ensure compliance with any notices from the DRP. The stay of demand was granted for 180 days or until the disposal of the appeal, whichever occurred earlier, with specific terms and conditions.Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the stay application of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of timely disposal of pending proceedings and compliance with directives issued in the judgment.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found