Co-operative society entitled to section 80P deduction on interest from bank investments, matter remitted for fresh examination

The ITAT Bangalore remitted the matter to the AO for fresh examination of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) regarding interest received on investments with banks and co-operative banks. Following coordinate bench precedent in Basaveshwaranagara Co-operative Society case and SC decisions in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd., the tribunal held that interest/dividend income from co-operative society investments is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The AO was directed to consider cost of funds as expenses under section 57 if interest income is charged as income from other sources. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to order of National Faceless Appeal Centre under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding deduction eligibility under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned by a cooperative society.

Analysis:
The appeal filed by the assessee contested the order of the Assessing Officer (AO) denying deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act for interest income earned from co-operative banks. The AO based the decision on the Totagars Co-Operative Sale Society case, asserting that such income is not operational income. The AO overlooked the assessee's compliance with government guidelines and bylaws regarding deposits. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, emphasizing the absence of a banking license for the appellant. However, the ITAT Bangalore in a similar case remanded the issue for fresh consideration in light of the Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. case, stating that if interest income is from cooperative societies, deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) is permissible.

The ITAT Bangalore directed the AO to reevaluate the eligibility for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned by the appellant. The Coordinate Bench's decision highlighted the importance of considering the source of income from cooperative societies for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). Additionally, if interest income is categorized as "Income from Other Sources," the cost of funds should be considered as an expense under Section 57 of the Act. The ITAT remitted the matter back to the AO for a fresh examination, ensuring the appellant receives a fair opportunity to present necessary details.

In conclusion, the ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a thorough reconsideration by the AO in accordance with the legal principles outlined in the Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. case. The ITAT's decision aligns with ensuring proper application of deduction provisions under the Income Tax Act, providing the appellant with a fair opportunity to present their case and comply with legal requirements.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal issues, the reasoning behind the decisions, and the directives given for further proceedings, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the case and its implications.

---