AAAR Tamil Nadu declines advance ruling on GST taxability of electricity distribution services under Section 98(2)

The AAAR Tamil Nadu declined to admit an advance ruling application under Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 regarding GST taxability on electricity distribution services including network charges, wheeling charges, cross-subsidy surcharge, and additional surcharge. The Authority modified the impugned ruling, clarifying that "applicant" refers to registered persons and the legislative intent empowers rejection of repeated applications on same issues. The Authority distinguished between internal departmental "call book" transfers and actual disposal through non-admission, confirming the application was properly disposed of rather than kept pending.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. GST applicability on network/wheeling charges, cross-subsidy surcharge, and additional surcharge for electricity distribution.
2. GST liability on various fees and charges related to electricity distribution services.

Detailed Analysis:

1. GST on Network/Wheeling Charges, Cross Subsidy Surcharge, and Additional Surcharge:
The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that network/wheeling charges, cross-subsidy surcharge, and additional surcharge are exempt from GST as per entry No. 25 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The Appellant contended that these charges are ancillary to the transmission and distribution of electricity and should be treated as a 'composite supply' with the principal supply of electricity, thus exempt from GST. The Appellant relied on the Gujarat High Court's decision in the Torrent Power Ltd. case, which struck down para 4.1 of Circular No. 34/8/2018-GST as ultra vires. However, the AAR did not accept this argument, citing the pending appeal before the Supreme Court.

2. GST Liability on Various Fees and Charges:
The AAR ruled that the following charges are taxable under GST:
- Application fee
- Meter rent
- Testing fee
- Service/line structure and equipment shifting charge
- Reconnection charge
- Labour charges for shifting meters or service lines
- Charges for providing CMRI data
- Changing/shifting of meter board/LTCT box/HT box due to damage or for additional safety features
- Charges for furnishing certified copies of documents to consumers
- Dismantling charge

The AAR reasoned that these services are not directly related to the transmission or distribution of electricity and thus do not qualify for the exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate). The Appellant argued that these services are ancillary and should be considered as a 'composite supply' with the principal supply of electricity, citing the Gujarat High Court's decision. However, the AAR maintained its stance, stating that these services can be provided independently and are not naturally bundled with the main service of electricity distribution.

Discussion and Findings:
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) noted that the issue of whether ancillary services to electricity distribution are exempt from GST is sub-judice, pending a decision by the Supreme Court in the Torrent Power Ltd. case. The AAAR emphasized that the exemption under Sl. No. 25 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) applies only to the transmission or distribution of electricity and not to ancillary services. The AAAR also highlighted that the term 'applicant' in Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, refers to any person registered under the Act, and thus the application should not have been admitted for services under dispute.

Order:
The AAAR modified the AAR's ruling, stating that the application for advance ruling is not admitted under Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017, concerning the taxability of the services discussed in paras 5.6.1 and 5.6.3 of the Advance Ruling No. 122/AAR/2023 dated 19.12.2023. The AAAR upheld the AAR's decision on the taxability of other charges, emphasizing that these services are not naturally bundled with the principal supply of electricity and thus do not qualify for the exemption.

---