Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the complaints under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 deserved to be quashed in exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on account of a mediated settlement and payment made in terms thereof.
Analysis: The mediated proceedings and the settlement deed recorded that the disputes between the parties had been amicably resolved and that the complainant had agreed to withdraw the complaints. The settlement was signed by the parties and their counsel, and the complainant had received the agreed sum of money. The subsequent attempt to resist the settlement on the ground that it was not placed before the court was found untenable in view of the record of mediation and the admitted receipt of consideration. Continuation of the cheque dishonour proceedings after acceptance of the settlement amount was held to amount to abuse of the process of court, warranting intervention to secure the ends of justice.
Conclusion: The complaints were liable to be quashed and the petition was allowed in favour of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a mediated settlement is duly recorded, acted upon, and the agreed consideration is accepted, criminal proceedings arising from the settled dispute may be quashed under inherent powers to prevent abuse of process.