Retired Sales Tax Officer wins appeal against GST default proceedings initiated without hearing

The Allahabad HC allowed a special appeal filed by a retired Sales Tax Officer against whom proceedings were initiated over six years post-retirement for GST defaults by his post-retirement employer. The court found that preliminary enquiry conducted ex-parte without providing opportunity to the retired employee violated principles of natural justice. The HC set aside the Single Judge's order dismissing the writ petition as premature and directed the matter be heard on merits, emphasizing that administrative actions with civil consequences must adhere to natural justice principles.

---

---

Issues:
Premature dismissal of writ petition due to retirement of petitioner-appellant and lack of departmental proceedings during service tenure.

Analysis:
The petitioner-appellant, a retired Secretary/General Manager of a cooperative spinning mill, filed a writ petition challenging a preliminary enquiry conducted against him post-retirement. The respondent no.3 engaged the petitioner on a contract basis after his retirement. A complaint was made against another party, leading to a preliminary enquiry against the petitioner. The petitioner argued that the proceedings were initiated without proper permission and in violation of natural justice principles. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition as premature, citing lack of departmental proceedings against the petitioner during his service tenure. The appellant contended that the dismissal was unjust as no opportunity was given to him before the enquiry, and the action was prejudicial to his interest.

The respondent, represented by the Additional Advocate General, opposed the appeal, stating that the petitioner raised a new ground in the appeal which was not part of the original writ petition. The respondent argued that the appeal should be dismissed as the reasons for the writ petition's dismissal were contained in the original order.

Upon reviewing the record and the order of the learned Single Judge, it was found that the preliminary objection raised by the respondents regarding the maintainability of the writ petition was upheld, leading to its premature dismissal. The Court noted that no departmental proceedings were initiated against the petitioner during his service tenure, and the preliminary enquiry post-retirement lacked adherence to natural justice principles. The Court referred to the Supreme Court's stance on natural justice and civil consequences of administrative actions, emphasizing the need for fair procedures.

In light of the principles of natural justice and the civil consequences involved, the Court set aside the order of premature dismissal and directed the matter to be heard on its merits by the learned Single Judge. The Special Appeal was partly allowed, granting the petitioner an opportunity to present his case before the Court for a fair consideration.

---