Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund of special additional duty of customs when the import duty had been discharged by debit of scrips under the Foreign Trade Policy, and whether such debit could be treated as payment of duty for the purpose of Notification No. 102/2007-Cus.
Analysis: The refund mechanism under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus operates only after sale of the imported goods in the domestic market and on discharge of the duty liability in the manner contemplated by the notification. Debit of scrips under an export promotion scheme was held not to constitute payment of duty in cash, and therefore could not support a refund claim for the amount so debited. The earlier Tribunal view was followed, and the distinction between valid cash payment and utilisation of scrips was treated as decisive. The cited Delhi High Court decision did not assist because the factual setting and the effect of the relevant DGFT public notice were different.
Conclusion: The claim for refund to the extent the duty had been discharged by scrips was not maintainable, and the appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Utilisation of export promotion scrips does not amount to payment of customs duty for the purpose of claiming refund under a refund-linked exemption notification.