Society's interest-free advances to specified persons for educational land purchase don't violate section 13(1)(c) provisions

ITAT Raipur held that advances extended by assessee society to specified persons for land purchase without interest or security did not violate section 13(1)(c) read with section 13(2)(a). The tribunal found that since the transaction was for purchasing land for educational activities, it did not constitute money lending to specified persons. The advances were accepted as genuine business transactions by revenue authorities, and CIT(E) had dropped proceedings for cancellation of registration under section 12AA. Addition of notional interest was deemed uncalled for, and denial of exemption under section 11 was held to be farfetched. The tribunal set aside CIT(A)'s findings and directed AO to vacate the additions, deciding in favor of the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Denial of exemption claimed u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Non-charging of interest on advance paid for the purchase of property.
3. Validity of the impugned order in law and facts.

Summary:

Issue 1: Denial of exemption claimed u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
The assessee, a charitable institution registered u/s 12A and 80G, filed a return of income for AY 2016-17 declaring NIL income after claiming exemption u/s 11. The Ld. Assessing Officer assessed the total income at Rs. 2,36,88,981/- by denying the exemption claimed u/s 11 and made an addition of Rs. 1,82,62,151/-. The Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) confirmed this addition. The Tribunal observed that the advances for land purchase were accepted in earlier years and subsequent years, and the Ld. CIT(E), Bhopal, had dropped proceedings for withdrawal of registration u/s 12AA, treating the transactions as genuine. Hence, the Tribunal concluded that the denial of exemption u/s 11 was not justified.

Issue 2: Non-charging of interest on advance paid for the purchase of property
The Ld. Assessing Officer added Rs. 45,26,830/- as notional interest on the outstanding advance paid to a specified person u/s 13(3) for the purchase of land, considering it a violation of section 13(1)(c) r.w.s. 13(2)(a). The Tribunal noted that the transaction was commercial in nature, and the Ld. CIT(E), Bhopal, had accepted it as genuine, dropping the proceedings for withdrawal of registration u/s 12AA. The Tribunal held that the calculation of notional interest and its addition to the income was unjustified and directed the AO to vacate this addition.

Issue 3: Validity of the impugned order in law and facts
The Tribunal found that the observations of the Ld. CIT(A) and the findings of the Ld. AO were not sustainable. The advances for land purchase were genuine business transactions, and the denial of exemption u/s 11 based on notional interest was incorrect. The Tribunal set aside the findings of the Ld. CIT(A) and allowed the appeal of the assessee.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to vacate the additions made and uphold the exemption claimed u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The order was pronounced in the open court on 02/01/2024.

---