Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the department could apply SION norms to estimate the quantity of zinc oxide manufactured from zinc scrap and treat the difference between such estimated quantity and the recorded production as clandestine clearance without payment of duty.
Analysis: The demand was founded on a theoretical production estimate derived from SION norms, but the appellants used varied zinc raw materials and the record did not show corroborative evidence of suppressed manufacture or removal. The reasoning in comparable cases was followed to hold that an assumption-based estimate, without supporting material such as transport details, sale proceeds, raw material procurement, electricity data, or other independent evidence, does not discharge the department's burden in proving clandestine manufacture and clearance. The provision relied upon for normal production under the erstwhile regime did not justify such a method under the present regime.
Conclusion: The demand based on SION norms and theoretical production calculation was not sustainable, and the finding of clandestine clearance was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A demand of duty for clandestine manufacture and removal cannot rest merely on theoretical production norms or presumptions and must be supported by corroborative evidence.