Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applications filed for fixation of special rate of refund under Notification No. 20/2007-CE were barred by limitation.
Analysis: The application for fixation of special rate was rejected only on limitation. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in similar matters that applications filed after the 30th day of September of the relevant year could not be treated as time-barred when the claim was otherwise maintainable, and held that the issue stood covered by its prior decisions on identical facts.
Conclusion: The applications were not time-barred and the rejection on limitation was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: An application for fixation of special rate of refund under the notification cannot be rejected as time-barred when, on the governing legal position applied by the Tribunal, it was filed within the permissible time as interpreted in the earlier binding line of decisions.