Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported 18-carat gold mountings were eligible for concessional duty under Notification No. 62/04-Cus., and whether the Board circulars could be relied upon to decide the claim without examining whether the goods had acquired the character of jewellery.
Analysis: The notification excluded gold jewellery from the exemption, and a circular issued under Section 151A of the Customs Act, 1962 could not enlarge the scope of the notification. The later Board clarification and the decision in Ratan Melting established that circulars are binding only to the extent they accord with the law. On that basis, only mountings not having the character of jewellery could qualify for exemption, and the factual determination had to be made by the appellate authority after considering the relevant circulars.
Conclusion: The matter was sent back for de novo decision by the Commissioner (Appeals) after fresh hearing and consideration of the Board circulars and the legal position on the scope of exemption.