1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Mumbai: Modification Application Rejected, Additional Pre-Deposit Required</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the applicants' modification application against the Stay Order, requiring them to pre-deposit Rs. 5,00,000 ... Modification application has been made by the applicants against the Stay Order of Tribunal - The applicants have raised additional grounds in the modification application, which they did not raise when their stay application was heard - Hence, they are precluded from raising it in the modification application. The Tribunal cannot keep tinkering with its Order as and when the applications for modification of the Order are filed. Otherwise, this will tantamount to reviewing its own Order, which is not permissible at the interim stage. - The modification application filed by the applicants is rejected. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the modification application filed by the applicants against the Stay Order, directing them to pre-deposit Rs. 5,00,000 in addition to Rs. 1,00,000 already paid. The Tribunal stated that applicants cannot raise additional grounds in the modification application that were not raised earlier. Despite rejection, the Tribunal extended the time limit for pre-deposit to four weeks.