Karnataka HC dismisses writ petition challenging GST show cause notice on Extra Neutral Alcohol for premature filing

Karnataka HC dismissed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice regarding GST levy on Extra Neutral Alcohol. The court held that the petition was not maintainable as the petitioner approached the court without first submitting a written explanation to the authorities. Relying on SC precedent in Union of India v. Coastal Container Transporters Association, the HC ruled that writ petitions at the show cause notice stage should generally not be entertained unless there are jurisdictional issues or natural justice violations, which were absent here.

---

---

Issues:
The issues involved in the judgment are the challenge to a Show Cause Notice issued under Section 50 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax, 2017 (KGST) on Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) by the petitioner, and the maintainability of the petition without filing a written explanation in response to the notice.

Challenge to Show Cause Notice:
The petitioner sought a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the Show Cause Notice dated 07.08.2023 issued by respondent No. 6 regarding the levy of KGST on ENA supplied by the petitioner. The petitioner contended that ENA, being un-denatured spirit, is not covered under the relevant notification and that respondent No. 6 lacked the authority to issue such notices. The petitioner relied on the decision in Bihar Distillery case to argue that industries manufacturing rectified spirit for potable liquors fall under the exclusive control of the State Government. The petitioner sought relief through the writ of certiorari based on these grounds.

Respondents' Argument:
The respondents opposed the petition, stating that the Show Cause Notice was issued under Section 50 of KGST, and respondent No. 6 had the authority to levy the tax based on the Central Government's notification. They argued that the petitioner did not submit a written explanation in response to the notice, as required, and cited the decision in Union of India Vs Coastal Container Transporters Associations to support their contention that challenging a Show Cause Notice without submitting a written explanation is not maintainable. They also referred to a decision of the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court to counter the petitioner's reliance on the Bihar Distillery case.

Judgment and Dismissal:
The Hon'ble Court noted that the petitioner did not provide a written explanation or seek a personal hearing as offered in the Show Cause Notice. The Court observed that the petitioner rushed to challenge the notice without availing the opportunity to present his defense. Despite the petitioner's reliance on the Bihar Distillery case, the Court referred to a recent decision of the Apex Court emphasizing the importance of submitting a written explanation before challenging a Show Cause Notice. The Court concluded that the petitioner's failure to provide an explanation rendered the writ petition not maintainable and dismissed the petition accordingly.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Show Cause Notice for KGST on ENA due to the petitioner's failure to submit a written explanation as required by law. The Court emphasized the importance of availing the opportunity to present a defense before seeking judicial intervention, citing relevant legal precedents.

---