Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to retain the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 despite delay in payment of the amount quantified in Form SVLDRS-3, and whether the adverse order confirming the service tax demand was liable to be quashed subject to payment with interest.
Analysis: The petitioner had opted for settlement under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme Rules, 2019 and had received Form SVLDRS-3 quantifying the amount payable. The attempt to pay on 30.06.2020 through NEFT and then RTGS failed, and the amount was debited and re-credited, indicating a payment failure attributable to technical difficulties rather than deliberate default. The scheme was treated as conferring a substantial amnesty benefit, and the Court held that such benefit should not be denied on these facts, but only upon compliance with the quantified amount together with interest at 9% from 30.06.2020 within the time stipulated in the order.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to the scheme benefit subject to payment of the quantified amount with interest, and the impugned order was liable to be quashed upon such compliance.