Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The applicant, M/s Waaree Energies Limited, an SEZ unit, sought an advance ruling on whether they are required to pay GST under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) for specified services such as Goods Transport Agency (GTA), legal services from an advocate, security services, and bus hiring for employees, as per notification No. 10/2017-IT(Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
The applicant argued that as per section 7 of the SEZ Act 2005, they are exempt from GST on services procured from the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) due to the overriding effect of section 51 of the SEZ Act, 2005. They also referred to various CBIC circulars and notifications, including notification No. 18/2017-IT(Rate) and Circular No. 48/22/2018-GST, which support their claim of exemption from GST under RCM for authorized operations in SEZ.
During the hearing, the applicant reiterated their position, emphasizing that Rule 5(5)(a) of the SEZ Rules, 2006, provides exemption from SGST, and Rule 30(1) allows DTA suppliers to clear services to an SEZ unit as zero-rated supplies under section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017. They also cited previous rulings and circulars that support their interpretation.
The Authority for Advance Ruling examined the relevant provisions and notifications, including section 5(3) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, section 16 of the IGST Act, and notification No. 37/2017-CT. The Authority also considered the FAQs on GST and a clarification from the Tax Research Unit, CBIC, which stated that SEZ units can procure services without payment of IGST under RCM if they furnish a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) or bond.
The Authority concluded that the applicant, an SEZ unit, is not required to pay GST under RCM on specified services, provided they furnish a LUT or bond as specified in condition (i) of para 1 of notification No. 37/2017-CT. This ruling aligns with the rationale provided in the Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling's order in the case of M/s. Portescap India P Ltd.
Ruling:The applicant, an SEZ unit, is not required to pay GST under RCM on specified services in accordance with notification No. 10/2017-IT(Rate) dated 28.6.2017 as amended from time to time, subject to furnishing a LUT or bond as specified in condition (i) of para 1 of notification No. 37/2017-CT.