Tribunal Dismisses Recall Application & Appeal; Upholds Authority's Decision on Debt and Default.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for recall, determining it was a request for a review, which is not permissible. The appeal against the order admitting the Section 7 application was also dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision, confirming the debt and default were established, with no grounds for interference.

---

---

Issues involved: Application for recall of order and appeal against order admitting Section 7 application.

Recall application details:
- The application sought to recall an order dated 1.3.2024.
- Counsel argued that certain facts were missed in the judgment and requested deletion of the cost imposed.
- Referring to precedent, the Tribunal has the power to recall an order but not to review a judgment.
- The Tribunal clarified that the application for recall was essentially a request for a review, which cannot be entertained.
- The application for recall was dismissed.

Appeal against Section 7 application order:
- The appeal was filed against an order dated 20.12.2019 admitting the Section 7 application.
- The debt claimed was Rs. 80,00,000 with a default amount of Rs. 66,76,565 as of June 7, 2019.
- The Adjudicating Authority noted the Respondent's submission of payment difficulties due to business losses.
- The Adjudicating Authority found the debt and default were proven, leading to the admission of the Section 7 application.
- The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision, stating no grounds existed to interfere with the order.

This judgment addressed the application for recall of an order and an appeal against the admission of a Section 7 application, emphasizing the distinction between recalling an order and reviewing a judgment based on established legal principles and factual considerations.

---