We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Personal Hearing Violation Invalidates Tax Assessment Under Section 75(4), Ensuring Procedural Fairness for Taxpayer's Right to Be Heard HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax order due to violation of statutory requirement of personal hearing under Section 75(4) of UPGST Act. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Personal Hearing Violation Invalidates Tax Assessment Under Section 75(4), Ensuring Procedural Fairness for Taxpayer's Right to Be Heard
HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax order due to violation of statutory requirement of personal hearing under Section 75(4) of UPGST Act. The court quashed the impugned order and directed respondent to provide petitioner personal hearing and issue a reasoned order within six weeks, emphasizing procedural fairness and natural justice principles.
Issues involved: The issue involves a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade - 2, regarding the tax period of April, 2021, for non-affording of personal hearing as mandated under Section 75(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Judgment Summary:
Issue 1: Non-affording of Personal Hearing Upon perusal of the record and after hearing the counsel for the parties, it was found that the petitioner was not given the opportunity of 'personal hearing,' which is a mandatory requirement under Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017. The significance of the word "or" in the section cannot be underestimated as it delineates two distinct scenarios where personal hearing must be provided: either upon application by the individual subject to penalty or tax imposition, or in the event of contemplation of an adverse order. Personal hearing is crucial for procedural fairness and natural justice, ensuring individuals can present their case and respond to allegations. The Court, citing precedents, emphasized that the opportunity of hearing is a legislative barrier to prevent abuse of power and safeguard individual rights. Consequently, a writ of certiorari was issued against the impugned orders, quashing them and directing the respondent to grant the petitioner a personal hearing and pass a reasoned order within six weeks.
This judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness and natural justice in tax and penalty determinations, highlighting the necessity of affording individuals the opportunity for personal hearing as mandated u/s 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.