Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tax Credit Dispute: Section 140 Challenge Halts Coercive Actions with Interim Relief for Petitioner's Claims</h1> HC examined petitioner's claim for transitional tax credit under Section 140 of CGST Act, 2017. Appeal initially dismissed, but HC agreed to hear the ... Summary order. Petition admitted for consideration; notice issued; matter adjourned to 11.09.023; copy to respondents to be supplied; matter to be heard along with CWP-2687-2021; in the meantime no coercive steps shall be taken. Issues Involved:The issues involved in the judgment are the claim of transitional credit under Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the dismissal of the petitioner's appeal.Claim of Transitional Credit:The petitioner claimed transitional credit of approximately Rs. 1.5 crore in its annual return of the last year. The counsel for the petitioner argued that this aspect was not considered by the authorities, and they did not refer to the relevant conditions prescribed under Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017. The counsel cited a judgment from the High Court of Jharkhand to support the argument. Dismissal of Petitioner's Appeal:The petitioner's appeal was dismissed by an order dated 13.06.2023. Since no Tribunal was functioning at that time, the High Court decided to examine the case. Notice was accepted by the respondent's counsel, who sought time to get instructions. The petition was adjourned to a later date and was to be heard along with another case. It was ordered that no coercive steps shall be taken in the meantime.