TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition After 303-Day Delay; Question of Law Remains Unresolved.</h1> <h3>PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Versus ANUPAMA MOHAPATRA</h3> The SC dismissed a special leave petition due to a 303-day delay in filing, with the justification for the delay deemed inadequate. The application for ... Delay in filling appeal before Supreme court - Denial of principles of natural justice - Assessee permitted to file revised returns - Claim for benefit of Section 10(38) - additions u/s 68 and 69 - Assessee not claiming exemption u/s 10(38) at the stage of the assessment proceedings Assessee turned around and make such claim of wanting to cross-examine persons make adverse statements against the Assessee at the stage of the appeal before the ITAT - As decided by HC [2023 (2) TMI 392 - ORISSA HIGH COURT] ITAT was justified in accepting the plea of the Assessee that the failure to adhere the principles of natural justice went to the root of the matter. HELD THAT:- There is gross delay of 303 days in filing this special leave petition. The explanation offered is not sufficient in law to condone the delay. Hence, the application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the special leave petition is also dismissed keeping open the question of law, if any. In doing so, we have also followed the earlier order of this Court in DIPANSU MOHAPATRA [2024 (3) TMI 217 - SC ORDER] The Supreme Court dismissed a special leave petition due to a gross delay of 303 days in filing, with the explanation provided deemed insufficient to condone the delay. The application seeking condonation of delay was also dismissed, and the question of law was left open. The decision followed a previous court order dated 01.03.2024 in a related case. Any pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
