TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Charitable trust granted section 11 exemption despite delayed Form 10B filing under discretionary powers</h1> <h3>Rajasthan Medical Relief Society Versus The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward, Central Building</h3> Rajasthan Medical Relief Society Versus The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward, Central Building - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of claim u/s 11 of the IT Act, 1961.2. Non-filing of Audit Report in Form 10B within the specified date.3. Denial of exemption u/s 11 due to procedural delay.4. Applicability of judicial pronouncements on filing Form 10B at a later stage.Summary:Disallowance of Claim u/s 11 of the IT Act, 1961:The assessee, a Charitable Trust registered u/s 12A, filed an appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) which sustained the disallowance of Rs. 3,38,71,393/- under section 11 of the IT Act, 1961. The trust argued that the authorities should have considered the entirety of the details filed in the ITR, which indicated a net loss, and therefore, no necessity for the claim under section 11.Non-filing of Audit Report in Form 10B within the Specified Date:The trust filed its return on 31.03.2019 but did not upload the Audit Report in Form 10B along with the return. The CPC denied the exemption u/s 11 due to the non-filing of Form 10B before the specified date. The Form 10B was eventually uploaded on 28.01.2020, well beyond the extended due date of 15.10.2018.Denial of Exemption u/s 11 Due to Procedural Delay:The CIT(A) upheld the CPC's denial of exemption, stating that the failure to furnish the audit report in the prescribed form along with the return results in disentitlement from claiming exemption under sections 11 and 12. The CIT(A) noted that there was no mistake apparent from the record in the intimation dated 17.10.2019, as the Form 10B was uploaded much later. The CIT(A) also mentioned that the appellant did not file an application for condonation of delay as required by CBDT Circulars.Applicability of Judicial Pronouncements on Filing Form 10B at a Later Stage:The assessee argued that the requirement to file the Audit Report u/s 12A(1)(b) is directory in nature and can be complied with at any stage before the completion of the assessment or even at the appellate stage. The assessee cited various judicial pronouncements, including decisions from the Gujarat High Court, supporting the view that substantial compliance with the procedural requirement suffices for claiming exemption u/s 11.Tribunal's Decision:The Tribunal noted that the CBDT had extended the due date for filing Form 10B up to 31.10.2018 and that the assessee had filed the form on 28.01.2020. The Tribunal referred to judicial precedents, including the Gujarat High Court's decision in Sarvodaya Charitable Trust Vs. ITO(E), which held that a trust could not be denied exemption merely on the bar of limitation in furnishing the audit report, especially when the legislature has conferred wide discretionary powers to condone such delay. Consistent with this view, the Tribunal directed the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer to consider the belatedly filed Form 10B and allow the claim of exemption u/s 11 to the assessee.In the result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
