Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee not liable for trust income over Rs. 650. Tribunal decision upheld. Commissioner to pay costs.</h1> The court held that the assessee was not directly assessable for the income of the three trusts in excess of Rs. 650 per year. The Tribunal's decision was ... Three trust deeds executed by the assessee's father for the benefit of the assessee, his wife, and his children and grand-children - Whether Tribunal was right in taking the view that the assessee was not directly assessable in respect of the income of the three trusts - Held, yes Issues Involved:1. Whether the entire income of the three trusts is includible in the total income of the assessee.2. Whether only the minimum amount payable to the assessee under the three trusts is includible in the total income of the assessee.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Inclusion of Entire Income of the Three Trusts in the Assessee's Total IncomeThe primary issue was whether the entire income of the three trusts should be included in the total income of the assessee for the assessment years 1962-63, 1963-64, and 1964-65. The Income-tax Officer argued that the assessee, being unmarried during the relevant years, was the sole beneficiary under the trust deeds. Consequently, the entire income of the trusts was receivable by the trustees on behalf of or for the benefit of the assessee. Therefore, the assessee was liable to be assessed directly in respect of such income under section 166 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner disagreed, holding that only the minimum amount of Rs. 650 was receivable by the trustees for the benefit of the assessee. This decision was upheld by the Tribunal, which led to the present reference at the instance of the Commissioner.Issue 2: Inclusion of Only the Minimum Amount Payable to the AssesseeThe court examined the terms of the trust deeds, particularly clauses 7A and 7B, to determine the disposition of the income. Clause 7A specified that the trustees would pay a minimum amount to the assessee and, if married, to his wife, children, and grand-children, with any remaining income being added to the trust funds as capital. Clause 7B outlined the distribution of the trust funds at the end of the 30-year period. The court noted that the assessee was not entitled to the entire income of the trust funds, as the trustees had the discretion to decide the amount to be paid, subject to a minimum annual payment. The balance of the income was to be added to the corpus of the trust funds and distributed at the end of the 30-year period or earlier if the trust was wound up.The court referred to sections 160, 161, 164, and 166 of the Income-tax Act to clarify the assessment of income received by a representative assessee. Section 160 defines a 'representative assessee,' and section 161 imposes liability on the representative assessee as if the income were received by them beneficially. Section 164 provides for the assessment of income where the shares of beneficiaries are indeterminate, treating such income as the total income of an association of persons. Section 166 allows for direct assessment of the beneficiary if the income is received on their behalf.The court concluded that the minimum amounts aggregating to Rs. 650 were specifically receivable for the benefit of the assessee and were therefore directly assessable in his hands. However, the income in excess of the minimum amounts could not be assessed directly in the hands of the assessee, as he was not entitled to receive it either during the relevant years or at any future point. The balance of the income was to be added to the corpus of the trust funds and could be distributed at the trustees' discretion or upon the expiration of the 30-year period.Conclusion:The court held that the assessee was not directly assessable for the income of the three trusts in excess of Rs. 650 per year. The Tribunal's view was upheld, answering question (1) in the negative and question (2) in the affirmative. The Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found