Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether synthetic resin in film form (Redux 775 film) was classifiable under Tariff Item 15A(2) as an article of plastic, or under Tariff Item 15A as raw material, for the purpose of additional duty and refund of differential duty.
Analysis: Tariff Item 15A(2) expressly included films among the articles covered by sub-item (1), and the material before the Tribunal showed that the goods were film form products falling within that description. On the tariff as it stood at the material time, the contrary view taken in appeal was found untenable.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under Tariff Item 15A(2) as articles of plastic, and the claim for refund of differential duty was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's classification was accepted and the respondents' refund claim failed.