Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty and tariff valuation were to be determined on the date of actual removal of goods under Rule 9A(1)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, or on the date of payment of duty under Rule 9A(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Rule 9A(1)(ii) applies where the date of actual removal of goods is known. Rule 9A(5) operates only as a residuary provision when the other rules are not applicable. As the date of removal was within the knowledge of the Revenue, the valuation and duty had to be worked out on that basis and not under the residuary provision.
Conclusion: Rule 9A(1)(ii) applied and the demand could not be sustained on the basis of Rule 9A(5); the appeal failed.