Plain meaning of exemption conditions: all excisable goods must be counted when testing the prescribed clearance ceiling.

Exemption under Notification No. 176/77-CE depended on a manufacturer's total value of all excisable goods cleared in the preceding financial year not exceeding the prescribed ceiling. The phrase "all excisable goods" was applied in its plain sense, so clearances of goods under other tariff items had to be included when testing eligibility. Because the assessee's total clearances exceeded the limit, the statutory condition for exemption was not met and denial of the exemption was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 176/77-CE when the value of all excisable goods cleared in the preceding financial year exceeded the prescribed limit.

Analysis: The notification granted exemption to goods falling under Tariff Item 68 subject to the condition that the total value of all excisable goods cleared by the manufacturer in the preceding financial year did not exceed the specified monetary ceiling. The phrase used in the proviso was "all excisable goods", not merely the notified goods. On that wording, the clearance value of other excisable goods could not be excluded while testing eligibility. Since the assessee's clearances of goods under another tariff item had exceeded the limit, the statutory condition for exemption was not satisfied.

Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the exemption and the rejection of the claim was correct.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the demand was sustained by upholding the denial of exemption.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification conditions eligibility on the total value of all excisable goods cleared in the preceding financial year, the condition must be applied according to its plain language and cannot be confined to the notified goods alone.

---