Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exporter contravened section 12(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 by failing to repatriate the full amount payable for the exported goods and, if so, whether the penalty imposed was liable to be interfered with.
Analysis: Section 12(2) required an exporter of notified goods to ensure that payment for the goods was received in the prescribed manner and represented the full amount payable by the foreign buyer, subject only to permitted deductions. On the facts found by the authorities, the exporter had effected a private sale of the goods, had not acted in accordance with the directions of the Reserve Bank of India, and had repatriated only part of the export value without establishing what amount was actually realised. The finding that the foreign buyer had paid only 50% of the value was disbelieved, and the record showed that the full transaction value was US $ 5976 while only US $ 2931.42 was repatriated.
Conclusion: The exporter was held to have violated section 12(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, and the penalty order was upheld.