Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Classification of Rear Dumpers under Tariff Item 34; Time-barred Notice under Section 36(2)</h1> <h3>COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BANGALORE Versus BHARAT EARTH MOVERS LTD., BANGALORE</h3> COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BANGALORE Versus BHARAT EARTH MOVERS LTD., BANGALORE - 1986 (23) E.L.T. 260 (Tribunal) Issues Involved:1. Whether Rear Dumpers and Haulpak Rear Dumpers fall under Tariff Item 34 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.2. Whether the show cause notice issued on 6-9-1980 is barred by limitation under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Classification of Rear Dumpers and Haulpak Rear Dumpers under Tariff Item 34Background:The respondents, a government company manufacturing earth moving machinery, were issued a demand for excise duty on Rear Dumpers and Haulpak Rear Dumpers. The Karnataka High Court previously held that excise duty under Item 34 does not apply to motor vehicles not suitable for use on public roads and remanded the case for re-examination.Arguments:- The Department argued that Rear Dumpers and Haulpak Rear Dumpers are adapted for use on public roads and thus fall under Item 34.- The respondents contended that these vehicles are not adapted for use on public roads and cited several decisions to support their case.Analysis:- Tariff Entry Interpretation: The Tribunal noted that all mechanically propelled vehicles adapted for use upon roads fall under the term 'motor vehicles' in Item 34. The explanation to the entry excludes specialized equipment mounted on such vehicles from consideration.- Precedent Cases: The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court decision in Bolani Ores v. State of Orissa and the Delhi High Court decision in Hindustan Motors Ltd. v. Union of India, which supported the Department's view that vehicles designed for use on roads, even at slower speeds, fall under Item 34.- Manufacturer's Pamphlet: The Tribunal examined the manufacturer's pamphlet, which indicated that the dumpers had features making them suitable for use on public roads, such as transmission systems, brake assemblies, and steering systems.- Usage Evidence: The Tribunal considered evidence showing that the dumpers were driven on public roads for delivery, confirming their adaptability for road use.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the Rear Dumpers and Haulpak Rear Dumpers are adapted for use on public roads and thus fall under Tariff Item 34 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.Issue 2: Limitation of Show Cause NoticeBackground:The show cause notice was issued on 6-9-1980, challenging the Appellate Collector's order dated 17-9-1979. The respondents argued that the notice was barred by limitation under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.Arguments:- The respondents contended that the show cause notice was issued beyond the permissible period.- The Department argued that the assessment was not complete due to the classification dispute and that the period under Section 11-A should be considered.Analysis:- Legal Provisions: Section 11-A was given effect on 17-11-1980, but the assent was given on 6-6-1978. The Tribunal considered whether the period set out under Section 11-A could be invoked.- Assessment Completion: The Tribunal found that the Department had completed the assessment and issued a demand, and the dispute was raised by the respondents.- Time Bar: The Tribunal held that the third proviso to Section 36(2) applied, requiring the show cause notice to be issued within six months. Since the notice was issued beyond this period, it was barred by limitation.Conclusion:The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued on 6-9-1980 was barred by limitation concerning the order-in-appeal dated 25-2-1971.Final Judgment:The appeal was partly allowed regarding the classification under Tariff Item 34, confirming that Rear Dumpers and Haulpak Rear Dumpers fall under this item. However, the appeal was dismissed concerning the demand related to the order-in-appeal dated 25-2-1971 due to the show cause notice being barred by limitation.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found