Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1993 (1) TMI 135 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Estate duty treatment of revocable trust corpus, deductible repair debt, and proof of liabilities determine partial relief. A trust corpus transferred to a beneficiary on premature extinguishment of a revocable trust was treated as a gift inter vivos by the settlor where he ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                                Estate duty treatment of revocable trust corpus, deductible repair debt, and proof of liabilities determine partial relief.

                                A trust corpus transferred to a beneficiary on premature extinguishment of a revocable trust was treated as a gift inter vivos by the settlor where he retained a life interest and an absolute power of revocation, bringing the transfer within the estate duty deeming provisions for dispositions made within two years of death. A claimed liability for unpaid car repair charges was allowed as a deductible debt because the repairs had enhanced the car's value and the amount remained outstanding at death. A miscellaneous liability was disallowed because there was no satisfactory proof of the alleged debt or its outstanding nature at death. The result was inclusion of the trust corpus in the estate, with only partial deduction relief.




                                Issues: (i) Whether the transfer of the trust corpus to the beneficiary on premature extinguishment of the trust constituted a gift by the deceased within two years of death so as to attract estate duty under section 9 read with section 22 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953; (ii) Whether the claimed liability of Rs. 9,000 being unpaid car repair charges was deductible from the estate; (iii) Whether the miscellaneous liability of Rs. 1,000 was allowable as a deduction.

                                Issue (i): Whether the transfer of the trust corpus to the beneficiary on premature extinguishment of the trust constituted a gift by the deceased within two years of death so as to attract estate duty under section 9 read with section 22 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.

                                Analysis: The trust deed reserved to the author substantial control, including a life interest in income and an absolute right of revocation. The resolution to extinguish the trust and transfer the corpus to the beneficiary was traced to the settlor's initiative and was treated as his act, though routed through the trustees. The transfer of the corpus within the vulnerable period before death was therefore viewed as an immediate gift inter vivos and not a bona fide transfer outside the statutory mischief. The transaction was treated as falling within the deeming scheme intended to catch transfers made shortly before death and settlements with reservation.

                                Conclusion: The inclusion of the corpus in the principal value of the estate was upheld and this issue was decided against the assessee.

                                Issue (ii): Whether the claimed liability of Rs. 9,000 being unpaid car repair charges was deductible from the estate.

                                Analysis: The valuation of the car was enhanced on the footing that repairs had improved its condition and value. On that basis, the unpaid repair amount represented an outstanding pre-death debt connected with the appreciation in value of the asset. Since the claim was part of the same transaction reflected in the increased valuation, the liability was treated as a deductible debt owed by the deceased.

                                Conclusion: The liability of Rs. 9,000 was allowed as a deduction and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

                                Issue (iii): Whether the miscellaneous liability of Rs. 1,000 was allowable as a deduction.

                                Analysis: No satisfactory evidence was produced to establish the nature of the alleged petty bills or to show that the amounts remained outstanding on the date of death. The burden of proving the existence and deductibility of the liability was not discharged.

                                Conclusion: The disallowance of the miscellaneous liability was sustained and this issue was decided against the assessee.

                                Final Conclusion: The estate duty addition on account of the trust corpus was maintained, the car repair liability was allowed, and the miscellaneous liability was rejected, resulting in only partial relief to the accountable person.

                                Ratio Decidendi: Where a settlor retains dominion through a reserved power of revocation and the trust is prematurely extinguished at his instance, the transfer of corpus within two years of death may be treated as a gift inter vivos by the deceased for estate duty purposes under the deeming provisions of the Act.


                                Full Summary is available for active users!
                                Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                                Topics

                                ActsIncome Tax
                                No Records Found