Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1991 (8) TMI 171 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Unabsorbed Depreciation Can Be Carried Forward Despite Delayed Filing The Tribunal held that unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward for set-off despite a delayed return filing, distinct from business loss, citing the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Unabsorbed Depreciation Can Be Carried Forward Despite Delayed Filing

                          The Tribunal held that unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward for set-off despite a delayed return filing, distinct from business loss, citing the self-contained provision of section 32(2). The appeal was allowed, instructing the ITO to carry forward the unabsorbed depreciation for the subsequent assessment year, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward for set-off when the return is filed beyond the time specified under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Whether unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward for set-off when the return is filed beyond the time specified under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Relevant Facts:
                          - The assessee, a private limited company, filed a return on 17-9-1985 declaring a loss of Rs. 33,785 for the assessment year 1985-86.
                          - The Income Tax Officer (ITO) declined to carry forward the loss, including unabsorbed depreciation, as the return was filed beyond the extended time under section 139(1).

                          Arguments by the Assessee:
                          - The assessee contended that depreciation allowance is different from business loss, relying on sections 32(2), 72(2), and 73(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          - It was argued that section 32(2) does not require the filing of a return within the specified time under section 139(1) for the unabsorbed depreciation to be carried forward.
                          - Reliance was placed on the judgment of the Madras High Court in CIT v. Concord Industries Ltd. [1979] 119 ITR 458.

                          CIT(A)'s Decision:
                          - The CIT(A) upheld the ITO's decision, stating that the phrase "profits and gains of business or profession" in section 72 is broader than "business loss" and includes depreciation.
                          - The CIT(A) distinguished the judgment in Concord Industries Ltd., emphasizing the amendment to section 80 by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984.

                          Assessee's Further Arguments:
                          - The assessee's counsel referred to authoritative commentaries and judicial precedents, arguing that unabsorbed depreciation should be carried forward and set off against future profits.
                          - Cited cases included Burrakur Coal Co. Ltd. v. ITO, CIT v. Kalpaka Enterprises (P.) Ltd., and the Supreme Court's observations in Garden Silk Weaving Factory v. CIT [1991] 189 ITR 512.

                          Department's Arguments:
                          - The departmental representative supported the orders of the authorities, relying on the Supreme Court's observation that unabsorbed depreciation is part of the 'loss' and thus subject to the same filing requirements under section 139(1).

                          Tribunal's Analysis and Decision:
                          - The Tribunal highlighted the distinct nature of unabsorbed depreciation, emphasizing that it is not strictly a business loss but a "specie" of the larger genus "loss."
                          - Referenced Supreme Court decisions, including CIT v. Jaipuria China Clay Mines (P.) Ltd. and Garden Silk Weaving Factory, which support the special treatment of unabsorbed depreciation.
                          - The Tribunal noted that section 32(2) is a self-contained provision for carrying forward unabsorbed depreciation, subject to sections 72(2) and 73(3).
                          - The Tribunal concluded that the return filed by the assessee, though delayed, did not bar the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation as it does not fall squarely within the requirement of section 139(1) for business loss.

                          Conclusion:
                          - The Tribunal upheld the assessee's claim, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and directing the ITO to carry forward the unabsorbed depreciation for set-off in the subsequent assessment year 1986-87.

                          Final Order:
                          - The appeal was allowed, and the assessee was entitled to carry forward the unabsorbed depreciation.

                          Summary:
                          The Tribunal concluded that unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward for set-off even if the return is filed beyond the time specified under section 139(1), distinguishing it from business loss and emphasizing the self-contained nature of section 32(2) for such carry forward. The appeal was allowed, directing the ITO to carry forward the unabsorbed depreciation for the subsequent assessment year.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found