Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether instalments paid under the hire-purchase arrangement for acquisition of the industrial unit were deductible as revenue expenditure or were capital expenditure.
Analysis: The agreement provided that the movable and immovable properties would become the assessee's property only after compliance with all terms and payment of the final sum. The ownership was therefore not transferred at once, and the arrangement fell within the hire-purchase category contemplated by the CBDT circular. Under that circular, the periodical payments had to be bifurcated into hire charges allowable as deduction and purchase component treated as capital outlay, with the deductible hire element spread evenly over the term of the agreement. The factual basis for the computation was not in dispute, and the circular was held applicable to the assessee's case.
Conclusion: The instalments were rightly allowed as deduction in the relevant years, and the revenue's objection was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where ownership under a hire-purchase agreement passes only on fulfilment of the contractual terms and payment of the final amount, the recurring payments attributable to hire are revenue deductible and only the purchase component is capital in nature.