Mutuality principle for a Nidhi upheld where surplus returned only to contributing members and not taxed.

The mutuality principle was applied to an assessee-Nidhi because deposits were accepted only from members and interest was paid on those deposits, while dividends were confined to shareholders who had dealings with the Nidhi during the year. Non-contributing shareholders had no right to participate in the dividend, so the surplus was returned only to persons who contributed to the common fund. That identity between contributors and participants satisfied mutuality and distinguished the arrangement from an ordinary banking structure where all shareholders benefit irrespective of transactions. On that reasoning, the surplus was treated as not liable to income-tax.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee-Nidhi satisfied the principle of mutuality so that its surplus was not liable to income-tax.

Analysis: The Nidhi accepted deposits from members and paid interest on such deposits, while dividends under its articles were confined to shareholders who had dealings with the Nidhi during the year. Non-contributing shareholders had no right to participate in the dividend. The surplus was thus returned only to those who contributed to the common fund, establishing the necessary identity between contributors and participants. The arrangement was distinguished from a case where all shareholders participate irrespective of transactions, which would resemble an ordinary banking structure.

Conclusion: The principle of mutuality applied to the entire surplus, and the surplus was not taxable. The departmental appeals failed.

---