Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1997 (8) TMI 117 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Block assessment addition for allegedly bogus sundry credits based on 50% estimate and unshared reports struck down; income at return. Addition towards alleged 'bogus sundry credits' in a block assessment was held unsustainable because it was a sweeping 50% estimate extrapolated from ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Block assessment addition for allegedly bogus sundry credits based on 50% estimate and unshared reports struck down; income at return.

                          Addition towards alleged "bogus sundry credits" in a block assessment was held unsustainable because it was a sweeping 50% estimate extrapolated from limited enquiries, the underlying inspector reports/statements were not confronted to the assessee, and mere doubts about credits recorded in books did not satisfy the statutory concept of "undisclosed income" under s.158B(b); further, the AO could not both discredit seized accounts as unreliable and yet rely on selected entries from them. The addition was deleted and undisclosed income was directed to be taken at the returned figure. Retraction from an oath admission was rejected since no cogent evidence of coercion or involuntariness was produced; the admitted sum remained included in returned undisclosed income. Superior-authority dictation was found to vitiate independent adjudication, but annulment was declined due to the assessee's own returned admission; relief was confined to deleting the impugned addition.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the addition of Rs. 1.68 crores treated as bogus sundry credits and brought to tax as undisclosed income for the block period is sustainable; (ii) Whether the sum of Rs. 50 lakhs admitted by the assessee in an oath statement constitutes undisclosed income and can be deleted after subsequent retraction.

                          Issue (i): Whether the Assessing Officer's addition of Rs. 1.68 crores as presumed bogus creditors is valid as undisclosed income for the block period.

                          Analysis: The Tribunal examined the basis for the addition (test inquiries with 4 of 43 creditors, late filing of creditors list, Inspectors' reports, and the Assessing Officer's reliance on estimates). It considered statutory definitions and procedures under Chapter XIV-B, the presumption in section 132(4A) regarding seized books, and the limited time available under section 158BE. The Tribunal found the addition rested on assumptions, limited enquiries, and was inconsistent with the Assessing Officer's own statements that books were unreliable; it also noted that entries of loans in seized books attract the presumption under section 132(4A) and cannot lightly be declared false without adequate evidence and full enquiry. The Tribunal further assessed whether directions from the Commissioner vitiated independence of the Assessing Officer but declined to annul the whole assessment on that ground while addressing the specific addition.

                          Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 1.68 crores as bogus sundry credits is deleted; the addition is illegal and unsustainable.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the sum of Rs. 50 lakhs admitted by the assessee in an oath statement under section 132(4) is removable from the undisclosed income on later retraction.

                          Analysis: The Tribunal considered the assessee's oath admission recorded under section 132(4), the subsequent return which included the admission, the later retraction, and the absence of cogent evidence showing the admission was involuntary, coerced, or otherwise unreliable. The Tribunal applied principles regarding voluntary confessions and the evidentiary weight of statements recorded under search proceedings and found no legally acceptable basis to treat the confession as involuntary.

                          Conclusion: The sum of Rs. 50 lakhs admitted by the assessee stands as undisclosed income and is not deleted.

                          Final Conclusion: The Tribunal partly allows the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 1.68 crores while upholding the assessee's declared undisclosed income of Rs. 1,06,92,950 (including the Rs. 50 lakhs confession); the block period undisclosed income is to be taken as returned by the assessee.

                          Ratio Decidendi: An addition in block assessment based on speculative estimates and limited enquiries cannot be sustained as undisclosed income; entries of loans in seized books attract the rebuttable presumption of truth under section 132(4A) and cannot be treated as false without adequate independent evidence and fair opportunity for enquiry.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found